>On Aug 29, Barnaby Evans wrote: >> >> Once again, totally agree. I know not everyone feels this way (quite the >> opposite), but I maintain that series 5 is, relatively speaking, pants. >So it's not just me who thinks "A Quarter To Midnight" completely >misses the target in terms of PG-style subtlety and innovation? Well we did mannage to spend a week or so discussing it so it must have held some fassination. I enjoyed it any way. >"Windfall" too - both these episodes seem to be aimed at a younger / >less-intelligent audience - they're too action-based for my liking. >Comments? >Matt. yeah but Friendly Fire and There Are Crocidiles were well up to standard. I guess you cann't always hit the mark. The first episode wasn't too bad - we final got to see inside Colin's flat! and I want one of those machene things. It also delt with Lynda's morality sould the story have been printed or not. I always felt the problem with Windfall was that there were missing bits - was it heavly edited? I felt nothing was properly explained. Natacha -- M a t t S a u n d e r s http://www.yoyo.org/matts/ 0973 479515 (mobile) -- T H E P R E S S G A N G M A I L I N G L I S T By default, pressing 'reply' will send mail back to the list, not to the author of the message you're replying to. To unsubscribe, mail "subscribe" to "pressgang-request@yoyo.org" -- T H E P R E S S G A N G M A I L I N G L I S T By default, pressing 'reply' will send mail back to the list, not to the author of the message you're replying to. To unsubscribe, mail "subscribe" to "pressgang-request@yoyo.org" |